Grievance Procedure:
This procedure is meant to provide an internal mechanism for the Washington Park Association of Hudson County to be used in the event of a complaint received from its public regarding accessibility. This procedure will also assure commentary in reference to the organization’s policies concerning ADA compliance. Every effort will be made to satisfy the complainant at the earliest stages of interaction, based upon the organization’s increasing capacity to provide for full physical and programmatic access.
Information Gathering
The Access Liaison (Board President) will communicate with the complainant to determine the nature of the complaint, and create an open dialogue with the complainant. Depending upon the location of the complaint, other staff may be involved in this initial process. The goal of this exchange is to address the complainant’s need as quickly and positively as possible, within the scope of the organization’s ability to meet that need, and to use that information to assess future needs determinations. The Access Liaison will document all information received.
Complainant Unsatisfied
Following the Initial Interview, if the client is not satisfied by the initial information gathering process/interview, the Access Liaison will encourage the complainant to participate in additional mediation which would include an additional member of the WPA Board of Trustees.
If the client is not satisfied by the above additional mediation, the Access Liaison will assist the client in preparing a written description of the problem, which will be presented for review to the entire WPA Board of Trustees. This complaint must include:
Name, Address, telephone number of complainant
Detailed description of complaint, including date and time
Location of access barrier
Client’s recommendation for resolution
Written Complaint
The Access Liaison will assure the complainant that the purposes of the Advisory Committee’s review is to ensure that a solution is devised that will meet the needs of the client to the best of its ability. This will be done within established programs and facilities, and the committee will consider establishing new policies, programs and facility improvements to ensure this success.
Reviews of Written Complaint
Review of the complaint will take place within 30 (thirty) days after receipt of written complaint. The committee will consider: Is the complaint valid? Was access denied? What were the circumstances of the denied access? Is this a standard or unusual condition? Was lack of access a result of policy, and if so, is a new policy warranted? What must happen for access? Are there possible alternatives? Are there any mitigating factors that would limit resolution to the problem? What is to be done to assure success in the future? Will the solution demand funding? If so, how will it be funded and on what timeline? What follow-up should be done with complainant and by whom? The complainant must be assured that the recommendations of the committee will be presented to the Board of Trustees of the Washington Park Association of Hudson County. The complainant is required to sign the recommendation(s) as acceptable to him/her, agreeing that if the recommendation is followed, the matter is therefore closed.
Resolution of Complaint
At the next appropriate Board of Trustees meeting, the recommendations of the Advisory Committee for resolution are presented, and a decision is made based upon that recommendation to allocate existing funds and resources and/or to include the recommendations as part of ongoing resource development. All staff are then notified by the Access Liaison of the nature of the grievance and its resolution. The recommended solution is then implemented.
This procedure is meant to provide an internal mechanism for the Washington Park Association of Hudson County to be used in the event of a complaint received from its public regarding accessibility. This procedure will also assure commentary in reference to the organization’s policies concerning ADA compliance. Every effort will be made to satisfy the complainant at the earliest stages of interaction, based upon the organization’s increasing capacity to provide for full physical and programmatic access.
Information Gathering
The Access Liaison (Board President) will communicate with the complainant to determine the nature of the complaint, and create an open dialogue with the complainant. Depending upon the location of the complaint, other staff may be involved in this initial process. The goal of this exchange is to address the complainant’s need as quickly and positively as possible, within the scope of the organization’s ability to meet that need, and to use that information to assess future needs determinations. The Access Liaison will document all information received.
Complainant Unsatisfied
Following the Initial Interview, if the client is not satisfied by the initial information gathering process/interview, the Access Liaison will encourage the complainant to participate in additional mediation which would include an additional member of the WPA Board of Trustees.
If the client is not satisfied by the above additional mediation, the Access Liaison will assist the client in preparing a written description of the problem, which will be presented for review to the entire WPA Board of Trustees. This complaint must include:
Name, Address, telephone number of complainant
Detailed description of complaint, including date and time
Location of access barrier
Client’s recommendation for resolution
Written Complaint
The Access Liaison will assure the complainant that the purposes of the Advisory Committee’s review is to ensure that a solution is devised that will meet the needs of the client to the best of its ability. This will be done within established programs and facilities, and the committee will consider establishing new policies, programs and facility improvements to ensure this success.
Reviews of Written Complaint
Review of the complaint will take place within 30 (thirty) days after receipt of written complaint. The committee will consider: Is the complaint valid? Was access denied? What were the circumstances of the denied access? Is this a standard or unusual condition? Was lack of access a result of policy, and if so, is a new policy warranted? What must happen for access? Are there possible alternatives? Are there any mitigating factors that would limit resolution to the problem? What is to be done to assure success in the future? Will the solution demand funding? If so, how will it be funded and on what timeline? What follow-up should be done with complainant and by whom? The complainant must be assured that the recommendations of the committee will be presented to the Board of Trustees of the Washington Park Association of Hudson County. The complainant is required to sign the recommendation(s) as acceptable to him/her, agreeing that if the recommendation is followed, the matter is therefore closed.
Resolution of Complaint
At the next appropriate Board of Trustees meeting, the recommendations of the Advisory Committee for resolution are presented, and a decision is made based upon that recommendation to allocate existing funds and resources and/or to include the recommendations as part of ongoing resource development. All staff are then notified by the Access Liaison of the nature of the grievance and its resolution. The recommended solution is then implemented.